Buying and Selling Life Insurance Policies in New York

When Life Insurance Denials Happen, The Insurer Doesn’t Always Get the Last Word

We recently secured a victory in court for our clients when we represented the sons of their deceased mother. The insurance company had issued two life insurance policies totaling $1,500,000 covering the deceased mother’s life, but denied the life insurance benefits to the surviving family members when the mother passed away. After the family submitted the life insurance claim, the life insurance company performed a long investigation of the claim, before denying it, because, according to the life insurance company, the mother had misrepresented her net worth in the life insurance application. The family believed that the net worth listed in the application was accurate and we sued the life insurance company on behalf of the family. Once the lawsuit was started, Metropolitan Life asserted that our clients’ mother made additional misrepresentations in the application that justified the company’s denial of the life insurance claim, even though the insurance company had never alleged the additional misrepresentations in its communications with the family.

The trial court decided the case in favor of the insurance company and dismissed the case based on the newly-alleged claims of misrepresentation, even though it found that the representation of net worth was accurate. However, we appealed the order and argued that the life insurance company could not rely on the alleged misrepresentations that were claimed only after the lawsuit was filed. The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department agreed with our legal argument. The Court found that the life insurance company was barred from claiming any misrepresentations other than the net worth of our clients’ mother. The Appellate Division also found that the representation regarding her net worth in the application was, in fact, accurate. Consequently, the Appellate Court not only reversed the trial court’s order dismissing the case but decided the case in favor of our clients. Although the life insurance denial was initially bad news for our clients, the life insurance company didn’t get the last word.

Don’t Lose Life Insurance Coverage When you Need it Most – When you are Gravely ill

Payment Grace Periods Can Protect Against Life Insurance Claim Denials

Most life insurance policies include a grace period during which the policy remains effective despite an outstanding premium payment. The grace period provides protection to customers against life insurance claim denials by the insurance company if a premium payment is late. As long as the insurance company receives the overdue premium payment within the grace period, the policy will remain in effect, and when the named beneficiary needs to receive the proceeds of the life insurance policy, life insurance claim denials are not allowed. If, however, the premium is not received within the grace period, the policy may lapse and the insurer may deny the life insurance claim made by the insured’s loved ones.

Often the grace period is written into the life insurance policy. Some states impose this grace period under their insurance laws. If the grace period is contractual, the specific terms, such as the period’s length and whether any penalties apply, will vary depending upon the exact provisions of the policy. Thus, in order to avoid denial of their life insurance claims, it is imperative that life insurance customers are aware of their particular policy terms.

Recently, in Corte v. First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Co., the attorneys at Trief & Olk represented a widow whose claim to life insurance benefits was denied. The basis of the claim denial was that the woman’s husband had missed a premium payment. However, the life insurance policy obligated the insurance company to provide thirty days’ written notice in the case of a missing premium payment. Trief & Olk’s attorneys argued that not only had the life insurance company attempted to return a premium payment it had previously deposited, the company had also failed to adhere to the terms of the grace period, thus removing any valid basis for the life insurance claim denial. Arguing that the life insurance company had ignored the notice and grace period terms, which prevented the claim denial, our attorneys successfully reached a confidential settlement for our client.